<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for United Against Islamic Supremacism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Reason cannot be an Islamophobe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on USA Today Fosters Occupation Rhetoric in Afghanistan by Mikko</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/usa-today-fosters-occupation-rhetoric-in-afghanistan/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=696#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Sometimes improved protection of military and civilian personnel isn&#039;t even difficult of costly.

KSJ is a fast-to-erect modular armouring system for protection of middle sized and large objects and personnel. During transport the KSJ handles as a 20 ft sea container.

A set of 7 pieces of 6 metre elements - a total of 42 metres of armoured wall - can be assembled in about an hour and erecting the wall elements requires no special tools.

The KSJ system can be used in many ways: as wall/barrier, as garage-shaped structure etc.

Thanks to their sandwich structure, the elements may be filled with sand or gravel - thus raising their portective capability considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes improved protection of military and civilian personnel isn&#8217;t even difficult of costly.</p>
<p>KSJ is a fast-to-erect modular armouring system for protection of middle sized and large objects and personnel. During transport the KSJ handles as a 20 ft sea container.</p>
<p>A set of 7 pieces of 6 metre elements &#8211; a total of 42 metres of armoured wall &#8211; can be assembled in about an hour and erecting the wall elements requires no special tools.</p>
<p>The KSJ system can be used in many ways: as wall/barrier, as garage-shaped structure etc.</p>
<p>Thanks to their sandwich structure, the elements may be filled with sand or gravel &#8211; thus raising their portective capability considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islam&#8217;s Golden Rule by perceptor1</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/islams-golden-rule/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>perceptor1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Huntingnasrallah,

The word &#039;completion&#039; was no doubt chosen intentionally to say to Jews and Christian that their faith was &#039;incomplete&#039;. (Over 60% of the Koran is composed of attacks on the faith of Jews and Christians.) 

The unity (better yet, the &#039;Singleness&#039;) of God was the buttress of the opposition to Christianity and to the polytheistic Arab pagans. The Jews already had this, though Mohammed invented the preposterous idea that they worshipped Ezra (Uzayr) as the son of God!

Ezra was one of the greatest opponents of idolatry!

I personally don&#039;t see tawid as the key to understanding Islam...that is part of the package, obviously. The &#039;Completion&#039; of religion (Yo! We have the ALL the truth...we have an order to put you out of business!)is the excuse the caliphs needed for invasion and conquest. 

My conclusion is that Islam is an imperial political movement covered by the flimsy veil and justification of the fabricated cover story of religion. 

Islam the caliphs&#039; dynasty at prayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Huntingnasrallah,</p>
<p>The word &#8216;completion&#8217; was no doubt chosen intentionally to say to Jews and Christian that their faith was &#8216;incomplete&#8217;. (Over 60% of the Koran is composed of attacks on the faith of Jews and Christians.) </p>
<p>The unity (better yet, the &#8216;Singleness&#8217;) of God was the buttress of the opposition to Christianity and to the polytheistic Arab pagans. The Jews already had this, though Mohammed invented the preposterous idea that they worshipped Ezra (Uzayr) as the son of God!</p>
<p>Ezra was one of the greatest opponents of idolatry!</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t see tawid as the key to understanding Islam&#8230;that is part of the package, obviously. The &#8216;Completion&#8217; of religion (Yo! We have the ALL the truth&#8230;we have an order to put you out of business!)is the excuse the caliphs needed for invasion and conquest. </p>
<p>My conclusion is that Islam is an imperial political movement covered by the flimsy veil and justification of the fabricated cover story of religion. </p>
<p>Islam the caliphs&#8217; dynasty at prayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islam&#8217;s Golden Rule by perceptor1</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/islams-golden-rule/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>perceptor1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding the sincerity of Mr. Paarsurrey&#039;s Ahmadist beliefs, it is most likely that the Islamic religion came into existence at least 150 years following the alleged death of Mohammed. 

The birth date of the Prophet displays a remarkable range of variance of eighty-five years! Little can be shown about Islamic origins...practically all is hearsay...hadiths...all written at least 150 years after the alleged facts...

Were most of the &#039;facts&#039; simply manufactured by the caliphs as justification for their Holy Arab Empire and their dynasties? I personally believe this is the most likely explanation. First the empire, then the cover story was invented.

True Muslim texts only begin to appear at the beginning of the ninth century (around 822 A.D.), coinciding with the first written Korans, as well as the first written traditional Muslim accounts.

There are no credible source texts extant since the caliphs went around destroying all the evidence from their predecessors and burning it! The al-Maghazi and What we have to prove the origins of Islam is some buildings and coins.

Indeed, it appears that the only secure date anywhere in the whole saga of the origins of Islam is 622 C.E., which has been confirmed from dated coinage as marking the beginning of a new era.

There are many archaeological evidence proving the cover story of Islam was fabricated. As late as 705 A.D. the direction of prayer towards Mecca had not yet been canonized. The quibla (direction of prayer) was still far to the north (southern Palestine?) and not towards Mecca. Official Islam says the qibla was changed in 624, but this assuredly did not occur until after 705 A.D.

In the hundred years following this period, Islam as we know it was created by order of the caliphs. The undecipherable, baffling text of the Koran was hastily thrown together with little apparent editing from a plethora of source texts. Who knows who their authors were? Some of the Koran may have come from Mohammed, but that is a subject for future scholarship to determine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding the sincerity of Mr. Paarsurrey&#8217;s Ahmadist beliefs, it is most likely that the Islamic religion came into existence at least 150 years following the alleged death of Mohammed. </p>
<p>The birth date of the Prophet displays a remarkable range of variance of eighty-five years! Little can be shown about Islamic origins&#8230;practically all is hearsay&#8230;hadiths&#8230;all written at least 150 years after the alleged facts&#8230;</p>
<p>Were most of the &#8216;facts&#8217; simply manufactured by the caliphs as justification for their Holy Arab Empire and their dynasties? I personally believe this is the most likely explanation. First the empire, then the cover story was invented.</p>
<p>True Muslim texts only begin to appear at the beginning of the ninth century (around 822 A.D.), coinciding with the first written Korans, as well as the first written traditional Muslim accounts.</p>
<p>There are no credible source texts extant since the caliphs went around destroying all the evidence from their predecessors and burning it! The al-Maghazi and What we have to prove the origins of Islam is some buildings and coins.</p>
<p>Indeed, it appears that the only secure date anywhere in the whole saga of the origins of Islam is 622 C.E., which has been confirmed from dated coinage as marking the beginning of a new era.</p>
<p>There are many archaeological evidence proving the cover story of Islam was fabricated. As late as 705 A.D. the direction of prayer towards Mecca had not yet been canonized. The quibla (direction of prayer) was still far to the north (southern Palestine?) and not towards Mecca. Official Islam says the qibla was changed in 624, but this assuredly did not occur until after 705 A.D.</p>
<p>In the hundred years following this period, Islam as we know it was created by order of the caliphs. The undecipherable, baffling text of the Koran was hastily thrown together with little apparent editing from a plethora of source texts. Who knows who their authors were? Some of the Koran may have come from Mohammed, but that is a subject for future scholarship to determine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islam&#8217;s Golden Rule by huntingnasrallah</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/islams-golden-rule/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>huntingnasrallah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>I like your line of thought here...I have come to the completion concept and agree with your assessment - however, I would see it as the completion of the Tawhid - the unity of Allah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your line of thought here&#8230;I have come to the completion concept and agree with your assessment &#8211; however, I would see it as the completion of the Tawhid &#8211; the unity of Allah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islam&#8217;s Golden Rule by Thinkomatic</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/islams-golden-rule/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinkomatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>While &#039;Islam&#039; is derived from the highly nuanced root &#039;s-l-m&#039;, it is not the same as peace. It may have been adopted in the post-Mohammed period (when &#039;hanif&#039; or &#039;mumin&#039; seems to have been preferred).

The most likely meaning of &#039;Islam&#039; derives from the nuance &#039;perfection&#039; or &#039;completion&#039;...that is &#039;wholeness&#039;...This idea proclaims the Koranic claim that Allah &#039;completed&#039; handing over to Mohammed everything that was required to please Allah in this life. 

&#039;Completion&#039; is far different in meaning than the English word &#039;peace&#039;...which denotes an absence of war.

Islam calls for war until the total subjugation of all infidels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While &#8216;Islam&#8217; is derived from the highly nuanced root &#8217;s-l-m&#8217;, it is not the same as peace. It may have been adopted in the post-Mohammed period (when &#8216;hanif&#8217; or &#8216;mumin&#8217; seems to have been preferred).</p>
<p>The most likely meaning of &#8216;Islam&#8217; derives from the nuance &#8216;perfection&#8217; or &#8216;completion&#8217;&#8230;that is &#8216;wholeness&#8217;&#8230;This idea proclaims the Koranic claim that Allah &#8216;completed&#8217; handing over to Mohammed everything that was required to please Allah in this life. </p>
<p>&#8216;Completion&#8217; is far different in meaning than the English word &#8216;peace&#8217;&#8230;which denotes an absence of war.</p>
<p>Islam calls for war until the total subjugation of all infidels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Islam&#8217;s Golden Rule by Thinkomatic</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/islams-golden-rule/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinkomatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1063#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>Well, Gary,
You are a great man to reconsider your position and change your mind.

There are frequent false oppositions and false choices presented to us by Islamic apologists. 

One of the false choices is &#039;Islam is a religion of peace&#039;. This canard is intentionally deceptive, but it is partly true. &#039;Yes&#039;, Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims are weak and in a position of military inferiority, but all that changes when Muslims are in a position of military superiority. At that point, Islam begins aggressive, expansionist jihad.

Your view that Islam is chiefly concerned with ethics...the ethics of prohibiting worship of any entity but Allah, is true. It is also true that to enforce this ethic Islam must possess a huge policing aparatus to repress dissent. This is where Islam is chiefly concerned with civil control. All sin is treated as a crime against the Islamic state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Gary,<br />
You are a great man to reconsider your position and change your mind.</p>
<p>There are frequent false oppositions and false choices presented to us by Islamic apologists. </p>
<p>One of the false choices is &#8216;Islam is a religion of peace&#8217;. This canard is intentionally deceptive, but it is partly true. &#8216;Yes&#8217;, Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims are weak and in a position of military inferiority, but all that changes when Muslims are in a position of military superiority. At that point, Islam begins aggressive, expansionist jihad.</p>
<p>Your view that Islam is chiefly concerned with ethics&#8230;the ethics of prohibiting worship of any entity but Allah, is true. It is also true that to enforce this ethic Islam must possess a huge policing aparatus to repress dissent. This is where Islam is chiefly concerned with civil control. All sin is treated as a crime against the Islamic state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engaged &#8211; Chapter 2 by John Houk</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/engaged-chapter-2/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>John Houk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1127#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Gary H. Johnson, Jr. provides a much needed word study of how Americans perceive toleration as opposed to how the religion founded Mohammed known as Islam is perceived. Gary advises you should find the definitions to &lt;i&gt;toleration, accommodation&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;sufferance&lt;/i&gt; to embrace an understanding of this exchange of letters between Gary and Chris. Trust me this excellent exchange of letters will be better appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary H. Johnson, Jr. provides a much needed word study of how Americans perceive toleration as opposed to how the religion founded Mohammed known as Islam is perceived. Gary advises you should find the definitions to <i>toleration, accommodation</i> and <i>sufferance</i> to embrace an understanding of this exchange of letters between Gary and Chris. Trust me this excellent exchange of letters will be better appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engaged &#8211; Chapter 1 by huntingnasrallah</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/engaged-chapter-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>huntingnasrallah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1116#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>The caliphate is an ideal common to the spectrum, you are correct in this, Ilshat.  Perhaps I should have spent more time on the concept of the caliphate, but I thought it best to save for a later discussion - Fatah.  These are chapters of a book, and we will discuss the global caliphate soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The caliphate is an ideal common to the spectrum, you are correct in this, Ilshat.  Perhaps I should have spent more time on the concept of the caliphate, but I thought it best to save for a later discussion &#8211; Fatah.  These are chapters of a book, and we will discuss the global caliphate soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engaged &#8211; Chapter 1 by Ilshat Alsayef</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/engaged-chapter-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilshat Alsayef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1116#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>I would have to disagree with your differentiation between Islamism/Jihadism/Radical Islam/Islamic Fundamentalism/Islamofascism; there are synonymous.

Islamists/Jihadis/Radical Muslims/Islamic Fundamentalists/Islamofascists consider it their religious duty to establish a global caliphate, a worldwide society based on Islamic Supremacism, i.e. where Islam is the dominant religion and where Muslims have status superior to non-Muslims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to disagree with your differentiation between Islamism/Jihadism/Radical Islam/Islamic Fundamentalism/Islamofascism; there are synonymous.</p>
<p>Islamists/Jihadis/Radical Muslims/Islamic Fundamentalists/Islamofascists consider it their religious duty to establish a global caliphate, a worldwide society based on Islamic Supremacism, i.e. where Islam is the dominant religion and where Muslims have status superior to non-Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engaged &#8211; Chapter 1 by Agha Amin</title>
		<link>http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/2009/08/16/engaged-chapter-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Agha Amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/?p=1116#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>ur comments on our blog are appreciated.please e mail ur address to my e mail in my blogger profile so that we can invite you to write for our blog so that your views may be debated

cheers

agha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur comments on our blog are appreciated.please e mail ur address to my e mail in my blogger profile so that we can invite you to write for our blog so that your views may be debated</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>agha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
