United Against Islamic Supremacism

Reason cannot be an Islamophobe

Islam’s Golden Rule

Posted by huntingnasrallah on July 7, 2009

Islam’s Golden Rule
An Engagement Chronicle

by: Gary H. Johnson, Jr.

On June 29th, 2009, Bill Warner, the Director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, released an article concerning the “Official Islam”.   His reference to the “Big Lie” of Mein Kampf was not the first time I had read this reference by the intellectual vanguard of Western liberty.  Ali Sina’s work at Faith Freedom International and his powerful 2008 release “Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet” have pulled on this kernal of Hitlerian prison rot to demonstrate the parallels between the tyranny of the Nazis and the totality of Shariah Law and the Clerical Establishment driving Political Islam, today.  In essence, there is great truth in the recognition of Muhammad’s Sunna-driven brand of jihad as a big lie.  However, if we be true to our hearts and our reason, we, as Americans, must come at last to admit that the truth in this reckoning has nothing whatsoever to do with Political Islam and everything to do with the Muslim Ethos.  

In full, the Study of Political Islam is a doorway to understanding the ideology of the Muslim “Faith”…it is not the ideology, itself…and it is not the only doorway.  One cannot look solely to the statistical analysis of jihad within the Sira, the Hadith and the Koran and find the soul of this Supremacist Movement.   Moreover, one cannot find meaning in the dualities of the Islamic Rationale simply by leaning on a political interpretation of the texts at the heart of the matter, whilst swelling one’s chest with the pride of an ill-conceived perception of the writ of abrogation, religiously or clerically speaking.   Without understanding the Muslim Ethos, understanding the nature of the Big Lie is impossible.  Indeed, without understanding the Muslim Ethos, delineating the caveats within the Ideology of Islamic Supremacism is the equivalent of tilting at windmills.

At base, the terror we face is not a tide of fascist warriors set on establishing their rule; rather, we face a tsunami of mercantilist slavers bent on establishing Allah’s Dominion over the Laws of Men.  

Presently, as it stands, we Free Men and Women of the West, have one soot covered shrinking window of daylight left on these shores of promise, dedicated to the creative capacity of humanity.  If reason’s rays find their path sealed tight, if the light of individual liberty fades, how will we judge right from wrong in the shadow of a memory?  How will we find truth in the dark of a desperate equality?   And it is in this vein that one must look to the shuttering window, sliding shut, and refuse to accept the dying of the light and as an act of volition must take a sledgehammer to the wall the darkening window sits within, as a measure of selflove, with the passion of friendship’s first gleaming.  Afterall, Fate is the foremost veil of Islamic Supremacism’s arsenal, while Promise is Hope’s opposite.  We free men and women of the West are not fated to accept the shuttering of our windows; rather, we hold within our minds the power to break through the walls that cage and breathe the promise of the dawning as we walk through, upright, shoulders back, chin high.  Hope is the resolve of a prisoner.  Promise is forged by the merits of a free mind.  And, regardless of which chords are intoned by the Obama Presidency in the Muslim lands, America’s Dream is not satisfied with the Hope for change within our gilded cages…America’s Dream is only Satisfied by a limitless sky and the boundless promise of individual flight.  In full, the antidote for Islamic Supremacism is and always has been the American Dream.  While the Muslim Ethos incites Jihad, the American Dream excites Reason.  While the Muslim Ethos aspires to the capacity of World Dominion, the American Dream inspires the invention of Worldwide Emancipation.  Faith in Reason, then, is not a far off thing…however, it is a volitional thing.

Individual Liberty is an earned thing, and only by engaging one another will we inspire the possibility and promise.  The rate at which we, in the West, are gaining ground on understanding the nature of contemporary jihadism and Islamic Supremacy is beset on all side by the fatalist whispers of corrupted reason.  Whether we realize it or not, we are fighting amongst ourselves, divided, leaderless, rudderless, with no direction home.  At first blush, this engagement chronicle may appear to dash the validity of the study of Political Islam, when in reality, this journal champions the heroic resolve of Bill Warner’s foundational efforts.  His ability to recognize the utter delusion necessary to swallow the pill of Obama’s “Official Islam” is not only commendable, it is rare and priceless gem.

Bill Warner’s assessment of President Obama’s Cairo rendering of “Official Islam” denotes a startlingly clear understanding of Barack Hussein Obama’s Engagement policies of Dhimmipolitik.   However, without a full breakdown of the Muslim Ethos and the ideological driving doctrines of Islamic Supremacism, the assessment is not actionable.   In all reality, Bill Warner’s assessment demonstrates this weakness in the declaration that not one line of the “Official Islam” is totally true.  In this, I beg to differ, that I might lend a sledghehammer to my friend.

Islam has a Golden Rule, Bill.  The Golden Rule of Islam is the cornerstone of the Institution of the Hisba.  This Public Duty in Islam is denoted in the Koranic Constitution of the Muslim Psyche by the ayat “Enjoin Good and Forbid Evil”.  To deny the value system of Islam is to destroy the Western ability to ideologically defeat the Political Islamists and Militant Jihadists ‘neath the umbrella of Islamic Supremacy.  The word “enjoin” means “command or demand from a position of authority”.  Therefore, the Golden rule of Islam, the source of the Muslim Ethos is based on Commanding the Good and Forbidding the Evil from a position of Authority.  A statistical analysis will not yield this definition, nor will scientific reasoning create a mental bridge which allows the Western thinkers tarrying in your footsteps to divine the nature of that authority, or the nature of Political Islam’s dedication to it.  Sure, 90% or more of the time in the Koran, when Jihad is mentioned it is aimed at militantly coercing the submission of unbelievers and taking converts into the fold…but that does not change the fact that the first verses of the Koran are found in Sura 96, and that verse imparts to the world that Allah made men from a clot and taught men by the pen what they knew not.  

Only by understanding that this “new knowledge” handed down directly by Allah is the source of Authority can one expect the Western world to comprehend the depths and ethics of Jahaliya rationale.  Moreover, only when the Western world grapples with the Koranic assertion that Allah made men and djinn solely to worship Him can one place any context to the value of prayer as the ultimate “Good” in the Muslim framed Ethos.  Islam’s Ethics delivers and imparts an affirming faith in the grace of transmission found in the exemplar of the Prophet, whose will to submit generated Gabriel’s presence and alburaq’s flight to Jerusalem.  Only by placing Political Islam in this framework, can the supremacy espoused by the clerical elites of modernity be understood, reasonably, as a measure of engagement.  Without Hisba, Islam is a religion.  With Hisba, Islam is a socio-economic totality, with a prepackaged, precharted avenue toward Islamic Supremacy.  The key to the recognition of the Islamic golden rule is to defy ALL attempts to give it creedence and moral equivalence to the Judeo-Christian version: “Do unto others”. 

In full, the Hisba destroys individual rights and replaces them with the capacity of man to aspire to Allah’s fatefully prescribed Limits.  Allah’s Rights supercede Human Rights in this frame of Ethical Authority.  Shariah Law, then, holds supremacy over all constructs of manmade law under the yoke of Hisba’s tyrannical construct.

The weakness of Political Islamic studies in comprehending the ideology of Jihad and Islamic Supremacism is akin to that of an old wind up alarm clock.  Time’s tumblers must be pressed back into line.  Old wind up alarm clocks are not designed for long term accuracy…they have three gears and must continually be wound and reset.  But what of the clocks in Big Ben and the massive clocks around the world that will operate far beyond our lifetimes and will always measure time to the accuracy of one one thousandth of a second?  What is the difference?  Gears.  The number of gears increase and as the number of connections and teeth increase, accuracy is fractionalized over and over and over and over, making the clock more and more and more efficient and accurate.  Political Islamic studies as laid down by Bill Warner are the primary gears of a Big Ben clock; however, to achieve complete understanding on the depths of Islamic Supremacist thought and to accurately surmise the path the West should take to guarantee its individual liberties in the wake of the constant challenges associated with the demographic expansion of the Islamic Faith, we must fractionalize our misunderstandings of the Muslim Ethos.  We must, as a guild of tinkers, build an accurate clock…only in this way will the cartography of contemporary jihad yield anything of lasting worth in the long run as America’s best and brightest gear up for the intellectual revolution. 

I take refuge in reason’s first principles.  History is a study in ethics and ethical movements.  Politics, economics, militancy, diplomacy, and civility spring forth from the ethical lessons of a people’s cultural heritage.  Ethically, the American Dream is the only champion capable of vanquishing the Islamic Supremacy inherent in the Muslim Ethos.

-signed…a Black Swan.

(7/7/09, 5:31pmEST)

11 Responses to “Islam’s Golden Rule”

  1. paarsurrey said

    Islam was never meant for political supremacy on others; it was for temporal, moral and ‎spiritual uplift of the human beings who needed guidance‎
    July 17, 2009 by paarsurrey

    http://unitedagainstislamicsupremacism.wordpress.com/‎

    Gary H. Johnson, Jr. says in his article “Islam’s Golden Rule”:‎

    Quote: “In full, the Study of Political Islam is a doorway to understanding the ideology of ‎the Muslim “Faith”…it is not the ideology, itself…and it is not the only ‎doorway.”Unquote

    Paarusrrey says:

    I don’t agree with the above concept. Quran/Islam/Muhammad never presented that they ‎were a political force, so to criticize them for a thing they never claimed to be for is not ‎fair on the very outset.‎
    Quran in the very beginning mentions the purpose of its Revelation; it was to restablish ‎the humanity on to the right path which all the revealed religions have lost grip on or they ‎became astray. It is for guidance of the prudent human beings. It was never for a political ‎purpose.

    I quote here first chapter of Quran to prove my point:‎
    ‎ ‎
    ‎[1:1] ‎بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ
    ِ‎[1:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.‎
    ‎[1:2] ‎اَلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ رَبِّ الْعٰلَمِيْنَۙ‏
    َ‎[1:2] All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds,‎
    ‎[1:3] ‎الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِۙ‏
    ‎[1:3] The Gracious, the Merciful,‎
    ‎ [1:4] ‎مٰلِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّيْنِؕ‏
    ِ‎[1:4] Master of the Day of Judgment.‎
    ‎ [1:5] ‎اِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَاِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِيْنُؕ‏
    ُ‎[1:5] Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help.‎
    ‎[1:6] ‎اِهْدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيْمَۙ‏
    َ‎[1:6] Guide us in the right path —‎
    ‎[1:7] ‎صِرَاطَ الَّذِيْنَ اَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ ۙ‏ غَيْرِ الْمَغْضُوْبِ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا الضَّآلِّيْنَ
    ‏‎[1:7] The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy blessings, those who have not ‎incurred Thy displeasure, and those who have not gone astray.

    http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=1

    So, Quran/Islam/Muhammad had no political aims or ambitions. Why make political ‎comparision?

    All human beings are just like a family; everyone of them is to be respected an love, not ‎to be hated.

    Thanks

    I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim

    • huntingnasrallah said

      Maybe I am just way off base, but doesn’t Islam mean “submission”? The last time I checked “uplifting” is nowhere a translation of Islam.

      • paarsurrey said

        Hi friend huntingnasrullah

        I agree with you that the root meaning of Islam is “peace” and “submission”. Peace with ‎the fellow human beings and submission to the will of God Allah YHWH- the Creator. ‎This is the most natural way; and is also the divine purpose of human evolution.This can ‎be best achieved, in my opinion, if all the natural and evolved human faculties are ‎maximized to the excellence; the temporal, moral and spiritual faculties are uplifted. ‎Concentration on one faculty while ignoring the others could disturb the natural and ‎divine balance of humanity.‎

        All human beings are just like one family; all must be loved and no one to be ignored and ‎hated.‎

        Thanks

        I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim

  2. Thinkomatic said

    Duality + submission = Master/Slave

    Gary or Black Swan or whoever you are,
    You have not demonstrated a difference with Bill Warner, but only a distaste for counting. Samuel Johnson said, “Many errors may be avoided by counting.”

    It is uncontrovertible that most of the Islamic trilogy is about the “infidel problem” and how to solve it. Mohammed was obsessed with the political subjugation of the infidels.

    Fitna is a political word. Though fitna is…dare we say “intentionally”…confusing, its meaning is a politically incorrect thought, especially a non-PC thought that is uttered. Uttering a thought that is not approved is punishable by death in Islam. This is what makes Islam a totalitarian system.

    The primary goal of Islam is to stop all “fitna” (a horrible crime). When that is done, totalitarian shariah is imposed on the world and no further disagreement occurs.

    All this is accomplished by superior military and police power ruled by the clerical franchise of one million mullahs.

    We see a perfect example of what shariah-world looks like in the Islamic Republic of Iran with its millions of Basij parapolice thugs (similar to the SA “Sturmabteilung” of Nazi Germany).

    You really agree with Bill Warner. There is nothing wrong with counting.

    • huntingnasrallah said

      The main thing I was trying to demonstrate with the Bill Warner article is the difference in a political and an ethical approach to the problem. Bill assumes that the problem is political – hence Political Islam – and he is absolutely right. I assume that the problem is ethical – hence Islamic Supremacism – and I believe I am right as well. I do agree with most of what Bill Warner puts forth. I consider him an ally and a friend and a very well educated thinker on the matter. However, I have recently been pouring over Bill Warner’s website and lectures and I am finding more and more agreement. When I wrote the article I had not researched his work fully, and my studies of Hisba put me on another track of thought. The way I see it is this – Political Islam is the Political component, Jihadism is the Militant component, Shariah Compliant Finance/Mercantilism is the economic component of Islamic Supremacism, which is an umbrella. I fundamentally disagree that the entirety of Islamic Supremacism is political, though its chief mouthpieces tend to reign from this perspective. In full, I believe it is an ethical problem, with many aspects. The reference to the Black Swan was a direct reference to the book “Defeating Political Islam” by Muthuswamy. Applying the lessons of Bill Warner is a process…and I consider his efforts invaluable to my own. Duality is the mode utilized in the study of Political Islam prism to explain the ethical hodgepodge of Islam – I believe there is a better way than saying that a duality exists. I would rather, contextually explain the abrogation and duality inherent in the submission of the slaver society that is insisted upon within the multifaceted parade of Islamic Supremacism.

      Gary H. Johnson, Jr.

      • Thinkomatic said

        Well, Gary,
        You are a great man to reconsider your position and change your mind.

        There are frequent false oppositions and false choices presented to us by Islamic apologists.

        One of the false choices is ‘Islam is a religion of peace’. This canard is intentionally deceptive, but it is partly true. ‘Yes’, Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims are weak and in a position of military inferiority, but all that changes when Muslims are in a position of military superiority. At that point, Islam begins aggressive, expansionist jihad.

        Your view that Islam is chiefly concerned with ethics…the ethics of prohibiting worship of any entity but Allah, is true. It is also true that to enforce this ethic Islam must possess a huge policing aparatus to repress dissent. This is where Islam is chiefly concerned with civil control. All sin is treated as a crime against the Islamic state.

  3. perceptor1 said

    Notwithstanding the sincerity of Mr. Paarsurrey’s Ahmadist beliefs, it is most likely that the Islamic religion came into existence at least 150 years following the alleged death of Mohammed.

    The birth date of the Prophet displays a remarkable range of variance of eighty-five years! Little can be shown about Islamic origins…practically all is hearsay…hadiths…all written at least 150 years after the alleged facts…

    Were most of the ‘facts’ simply manufactured by the caliphs as justification for their Holy Arab Empire and their dynasties? I personally believe this is the most likely explanation. First the empire, then the cover story was invented.

    True Muslim texts only begin to appear at the beginning of the ninth century (around 822 A.D.), coinciding with the first written Korans, as well as the first written traditional Muslim accounts.

    There are no credible source texts extant since the caliphs went around destroying all the evidence from their predecessors and burning it! The al-Maghazi and What we have to prove the origins of Islam is some buildings and coins.

    Indeed, it appears that the only secure date anywhere in the whole saga of the origins of Islam is 622 C.E., which has been confirmed from dated coinage as marking the beginning of a new era.

    There are many archaeological evidence proving the cover story of Islam was fabricated. As late as 705 A.D. the direction of prayer towards Mecca had not yet been canonized. The quibla (direction of prayer) was still far to the north (southern Palestine?) and not towards Mecca. Official Islam says the qibla was changed in 624, but this assuredly did not occur until after 705 A.D.

    In the hundred years following this period, Islam as we know it was created by order of the caliphs. The undecipherable, baffling text of the Koran was hastily thrown together with little apparent editing from a plethora of source texts. Who knows who their authors were? Some of the Koran may have come from Mohammed, but that is a subject for future scholarship to determine.

  4. huntingnasrallah said

    Salam means Peace. Islam means Submission. These two words are not the same. I do not agree with your assessment of my understanding.

  5. Thinkomatic said

    While ‘Islam’ is derived from the highly nuanced root ’s-l-m’, it is not the same as peace. It may have been adopted in the post-Mohammed period (when ‘hanif’ or ‘mumin’ seems to have been preferred).

    The most likely meaning of ‘Islam’ derives from the nuance ‘perfection’ or ‘completion’…that is ‘wholeness’…This idea proclaims the Koranic claim that Allah ‘completed’ handing over to Mohammed everything that was required to please Allah in this life.

    ‘Completion’ is far different in meaning than the English word ‘peace’…which denotes an absence of war.

    Islam calls for war until the total subjugation of all infidels.

  6. huntingnasrallah said

    I like your line of thought here…I have come to the completion concept and agree with your assessment – however, I would see it as the completion of the Tawhid – the unity of Allah.

  7. perceptor1 said

    Dear Mr. Huntingnasrallah,

    The word ‘completion’ was no doubt chosen intentionally to say to Jews and Christian that their faith was ‘incomplete’. (Over 60% of the Koran is composed of attacks on the faith of Jews and Christians.)

    The unity (better yet, the ‘Singleness’) of God was the buttress of the opposition to Christianity and to the polytheistic Arab pagans. The Jews already had this, though Mohammed invented the preposterous idea that they worshipped Ezra (Uzayr) as the son of God!

    Ezra was one of the greatest opponents of idolatry!

    I personally don’t see tawid as the key to understanding Islam…that is part of the package, obviously. The ‘Completion’ of religion (Yo! We have the ALL the truth…we have an order to put you out of business!)is the excuse the caliphs needed for invasion and conquest.

    My conclusion is that Islam is an imperial political movement covered by the flimsy veil and justification of the fabricated cover story of religion.

    Islam the caliphs’ dynasty at prayer.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>